Articles, Blog



The next-generation Long-Range Anti-Ship Missiles
(LRASM) achieved early operational capability (EOC) with the F/A-18E/F Super Hornets last
month. As reported in , a Naval Air Systems
Command public affairs officer has stated, “the Navy achieved early operational capability
(EOC) for the Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM) on the F/A-18 in November 2019. LRASM will play a significant role in ensuring
military access to operate in the Pacific and in the littorals by providing a long-range
surface warfare capability.” U.S has been lagging in Anti Ship Missiles
development , but this is a significant step. LRASM is standoff weapon with a range of 500
nautical miles that is around 925 km or 575 miles. US Navy operates around 10 nuclear-powered
supercarriers which are more than all the other nations combined. Each of these have an air wing which consists
of F/A-18E/F that will now be able to carry the LRASM. In this video Defense Updates analyzes how
American Supercarriers will take out Chinese & Russian warship before they can strike? Let’s get into the details. This video is sponsored by War Thunder. If you are, like us, fascinated by military
vehicles and technology, I recommend you give War Thunder a try. It’s a military vehicle combat game which
you can download and play for free on PC, PlayStation4 and Xbox One – with cross-platform
support. It has a huge variety of more than 1200 playable
aircraft, tanks, helicopters and ships from the 1930s to the 1990s, which you can take
to battle on land, in the air and at sea on more than 80 theaters of war. War Thunder has been kind enough to offer
all Defense Updates viewers a special bonus, which will grant you a free premium tank or
aircraft or ship and three days of premium account time for registering using our link
in the description below. So, take the plunge and join the more than
20 million players from all over the world! The U.S has been fighting with adversaries
that have no or very small navy like Iraq or Afghanistan. The inadequacy in Anti Ship capability crept
in mainly due to a lack of credible opponents. America was focusing on military assets that
were more in line with these battles like the development of drones. This lead to a lull in the development of
advance Anti-ship missiles. But things have changed in the last decade
as Russia & China have developed a range of anti-ship missiles that challenge the supremacy
of U.S surface warfare capability. Both of these countries have strong navies
and are actively pursuing ways to counter the U.S Navy by developing a wide variety
of Anti-ship missiles that can target U.S warships from long ranges. Now the U.S is responding to the emerging
threat. The U.S currently uses Harpoon missile as
the main Anti Ship weapon. Initially developed in the 1970s, it has seen
many upgraded over the year but is essentially a 5-decade old design. It is an over-the-horizon, anti-ship missile
manufactured by Boeing. Harpoon ER (Extended Range) can reach targets
at a maximum distance of 80 miles or 130 KM. It has a speed of Mach 0.7, which means it
has high subsonic speed but not supersonic. U.S do have SM1, SM 2 & SM6 supersonic missiles
which have a primary role of air defense with a secondary Anti Ship role, but their small
warheads are not capable of crippling a large warship. The only credible anti-ship weapon is the
NSM The Naval Strike Missiles or NSM is the upgrade
of Kongsberg’s Penguin short-to-medium range anti-ship guided missile. The missile has a range of 100 miles or 185
km. NSM is capable of high subsonic speeds. It has sea skim mode by which it travels very
close to the surface, making it hard to detect and intercept. It is also designed to maneuver to avoid enemy
defenses. It is equipped with a 276 pounds or 125 kg
multi-purpose blast/fragmentation warhead. NSM features an imaging IR-seeker which is
complimented by inertial/GPS navigation. The missile also has a built-in database of
representative ship types to distinguish between intended targets and other objects. But even NSM is constrained by its range. For example, the Indo Russian Brahmos missile
can fly at supersonic speed and have a range of 185 miles or 300 km. Its range is being upgraded. The Russian ramjet-powered P-800 Oniks is
capable of streaking at naval targets up to 370 miles or 600 km away at speeds of Mach
2.5 The Chinese YJ-12 has a speed of around Mach
2, if launched from low altitude and up to Mach 3.2, if launched from high altitude. It has a maximum range of around 235 miles
or 380 km depending on launch altitude. The 3M22 Zircon developed by Russia is said
to have the capability to reach speed up to Mach 8 and has a max range of 600 miles or
around 1000 km depending on launch trajectory. These missiles outrange American once and
because of their supersonic speed will be hard to intercept especially when a barrage
of these is fired. The AGM-158 Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff
Missile is a stealthy and highly precise surface-skimming cruise missile with a range of 230 miles or
620 for the Extended Range AGM-158B. Viewers may note that a shorter range variant
was used in combat on April 4, 2018, when two B-1B bombers launched nineteen of the
stealth missiles at a Syrian research center in Barzeh. Lockheed Martin worked on the missile further
and AGM-158C is developed which is an antiship variant and is named LRSM by the U.S Navy. The missile is subsonic and but since it is
LO (Low Observable), the enemy warship will not see it coming till it is very close. This strategy is a stark contrast to Russian
and Chinese missile which depend on speed to defeat the ship’s defense. It is powered by an F107 turbofan engine and
has a 1,000 lb (450 kg) blast-fragmentation penetrator. The warhead is potent enough to cripple a
large warship. LRASM will cost around $3 million apiece which
makes it twice as costly as Harpoon missiles. US Navy plans to acquire 467 LRASMs with an
initial order of 23. LRASM deploys multiple sensors & techniques
to home in on the targets. The details are here: 1. It has an inertial and jam-resistant GPS navigation
system. This is mainly used for navigating the initial
phase of the journey. 2. A two-way data link is present, which allows
the launching warship to send course corrections data. It will be used for mid-course guidance during
which missile flies at medium altitude. 3. It has a guidance algorithm that can acquire
& target enemy ships when external guidance is disrupted. It is mainly used in the mid to final phase. The algorithm is smart enough to differentiate
civilian ships and low priority enemy warships from the actual target. 4. It has a Radio-frequency sensor which is activated
in the terminal phase. The system homes in on an adversary’s radar
signals—the very radar which is used by the enemy warships to track the missile. 5. In the terminal phase, the Infra Red sensor
is also engaged. It is used to make the last-ditch adjustment
so that the missile can hit specific points of an enemy warship to maximize damage. In this phase, the missile skims close to
the surface which makes it hard to target. It is important to note that LRASMs can be
deployed in swarm mode which will enable it to saturate enemy defenses. LRASM also deploys electronic counter-countermeasures
(ECCM) to overcome the enemy’s countermeasures. F/A-18E/F have a combat radius of 390 nmi
(449 mi, 722 km). So, the LRASM equipped F/A-18E/F will be able
to strike targets at ranges of almost 900 nmi. This is an excellent tactical ability especially
when we take into account that American Supercarrier have very capable airborne early warning platform,
the E-2D Hawkeye manufactured by Northrop Grumman. Operating from an altitude above 25,000ft,
the Hawkeye can warn the naval task force of approaching threats and can provide positional
data to the F/A-18E/F Super Hornets. Super Hornets are very capable and battle
tested aircraft which has seen many rounds of upgrades that have kept them optimized
for changing battle scenarios. These jets will be able to home in on the
Russian and Chinese warships and will be able to launch the LRASM without having to enter
their strike envelop. The duo will surely be a potent adversary
for any American rivals. Furthermore , American Carrier Strike Group
have Arleigh Burke class Destroyers that have 96 Mark 41 cells & Ticonderoga class Cruisers
that have 122 of these cells LRASM will be integrated to Mark 41 cells
too going forward and this will make it even more versatile.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


  1. America produces over half the war materiel on earth. Our largest buyer for decades is Saudi Arabia. Our only enduring military victory since WW2 was "Battle of Grenada, 1983" . All the rest were pointless slaughters of people far away. War is a product of war industries marketing their product based upon fear. Nice to see it playing out on Youtube instead of the 3-d world.

  2. Great sea skimming missile AND the USA will soon have hypersonic missiles with many ways to deliver them, a game changer as know one would dare use their hypersonics if we also have them unless they are thinking all out war which would also be very bad for them and they know it.

  3. Couldn't they make a mini nuke missile with ram jet to take out ships๐Ÿค” forget just putting a hole in the ship blast it out of the water

  4. Congratulations! You finally got the hint and turned off the captions.

    UPDATE: They returned after the first commercial. WTF, Defense Updates?


    ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ ๐Ÿ’ž ๐ŸŒ STAY STRONG & READY
    FREEDOM FIGHTERS ๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ’ž ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ

  6. F-35s shadowing Chinese ships can provide targeting information to LRASMS just as F-35s can with SM-6s.

    Bye bye Chinese navy.

  7. LRASM and LRSO , potent combination to destroy either VaChina , Pussia or both !

  8. What is with all the pushing war crap today. And I didn't ask for this shit. Stop putting this shit in my file. I don't give a shit about war.

  9. Hello !!! From the other side please to HEAVEN sake stop this FAKE NEWS !!!! Lets do the MATH ….S 400 Missile TRAVEL AT WHAT SPEED ? ZIRCON MISSILE TRAVEL AT WHAT SPEED ? and there are OTHER MISSILES not mention here !!! So you know and I know RUSSIAN MISSILE SPEED and CHINA IS NOW CLOSE PARTNERS WITH RUSSIA !!!! Please lets see you do the MATH !!!! and FAKE NEWS !!!

  10. Anytime you bring a new technology to destroy enemy warships or planes, you are likely to see the enemy developing similar technology in the near future. Therefore, you always have to be continuously developing new technology, so that enemy will never be able to catch-up. Just like programming language. Anytime you learn the feature for a new language, a new version will be available, and you will have a hard time or long time to catch-up.

  11. I love military acronyms. Can't wait for this military booty to shake the ground

    Bomber Interdiction Ground Air Surface Surface Missile.

  12. Gee, 500 miles, while China and Russia have perfected hypersonic missiles with ranges in the thousands of miles… who's kidding who, Americans better wake up!

  13. This man think he is playing war thunder ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚ "take out out Russia and China before they make a move" ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚ you are a grown man dont think like a kid

  14. You are mistaken. When Americans cant beat even the stone age Afghans, do you really think they are capable of anything?

  15. So going to war with Russia , China …. humm LOL remain to be seen or hear its going to be a nukeler war fer that goes an all out HELL in a few minutes not be funny its real just up set the hole planet.

  16. Russia got more versatile missile than any country in the world and up to date that a FACT. Don't make Russia made ! Thanks

  17. Let us be serious for a moment with the limited number of these weapons available the swarm attack scenario is unrealistic as it is for the Russians and Chinese. Without a mass procurement and extensive operational deployment these weapons are merely a one use and hope it works weapon. The same can said of the opponent's weapon neither of which are available in numbers to be tactically effective.

  18. Any fool thinking this stupid ideas will work, he will die a fool.
    War between Russia and the US will go nuclear in less then 24 hours.

  19. I just wanna to say that: โ€œNo Battle Plan Survives Contact With the Enemyโ€ Helmuth von Moltke (German military strategist)

  20. For the past 18 years the US is trying to beat guy's on sandals armed with AK rifles in Afghanistan.
    How is that working out?. That Orange clown is working out a deal with the Taliban because the US CANNOT WIN.
    I would laugh my ass off if it wasn't so pathetic.

  21. I wonder. US aircraft carrier in the Med attacking Iranian fleet in the Persian Gulf.
    Defend Taiwan from invasion from mainland China. Attach China's manmade islands in the South China Sea. Lots of potential targets. Lots of potential customers are US allies.

  22. China's military is just for defense purpose, unlike USA need to send military forces to all over the world. therefore, for defending purpose, China has capability of secure a defend line of about 3000 km from mainland China (with island in SCS, this line could be further away from China's mainland), with land based long range antiship missiles, such as DF-26 to cover Guan and surrounding areas with range of 3,000โ€“5,471 km, DF-17 hypersonic with range about ~1 ,800โ€“2,500 kilometres, DF-21D, and with submarine based YJ18 with range of 600 km, any attack with 3000 km range towards China'a navy will be retaliated.
    however, you may keep dreaming, it is free and can make you happy, haha :))

  23. China has 2 Aircraft carriers Russia only one. Most Russian Warships are Small missile boats. designed to attack American aircraft carrier groups. So our new missile is designed to target what?

  24. Who really cares about any of this?
    We need more videos on the space force and the stuff we got up there. ๐Ÿธ๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿฝ

  25. ok good copy/speaking by DU of the original national review article, but why — unlike national review — omit that CIWSs would take care no prob of this slow subsonic turkey?

    ============ A second consideration is that while the stealthy LRASM may evade radar direction and delay response of antiaircraft defenses until too late, its subsonic speed may leave it a comparatively easy target for shorter-range close-defense autocannons and heat-seeking missilesโ€”though the LRASM supposedly has a reduced infrared signature.

    A final issue is price: the LRASM appear to cost roughly $3 million per missile, making it a premium asset at over twice the cost of newer-model Harpoon missiles. This could limit the number fielded. Currently, the Navy seeks to acquire 467 LRASMs, though in the near term only twenty-three are on order.

  26. I told you that's why I like your analysis you always tell the truth and the truth is eternal ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ‘Š but I don't think this coming war his going to be more than 1/2 hours this is not a war between Tom B and harry fighting till the death ๐Ÿ•ณ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ’จ๐Ÿ’ญ

  27. imagine just one squadron of F18,s with one of these stealthy missiles under each wing being covered by a few F35C,s and taking out Chinas entire carrier lol by the time china knows what's going down the second strike will be launching from over five hundred miles away:)

  28. Once a war starts between China, Russia, and the US, the world is coming to an end. So, let's pray for no wars. If Defense Updates wants a war, then we send Defense Updates to the front lines. Better yet, we send their kids to war.

  29. 50 or 100 of these will swarm the only aircraft carrier China has. bye bye Chinese navy.
    others will destroy coastal defenses
    US armed forces lands and start a blitz war invasion
    NATO attacks Russia from a 3 fronts to distract it from helping China
    US rangers plant the US flag on the roof of Zhongnanhai (presidential palace) in Beijing. Bye Bye China

    Russia surrenders and installs a pro western regime.
    Hail Hydra
    Next target: India

  30. Sinking an enemy warship is an act of war. To be certain of a total kill the warhead should be replaced with a small nuclear warhead.

  31. I don't understand how these prop Hawkeyes are not easy targets for jets that would surely take them out without much difficulty to cripple the "eyes" of these ships.

  32. You say that but I hear bias in here you are not unbiased china is just as powerful as the USA so is Russia they arent broke like most of our enemies we fight so it will be an all-out murder feast

  33. Missiles are a waste of money, when the Russian and Chinese ships are self-destructive: their own rust will send them to the bottom.

  34. Personally I think the B1A would be able to use its rotary launcher as well, as the LRASM is very capable it should be very potent too.

  35. Americans have lost every war they had with armed adversaries.Even with unarmed people who live in sandy areas. just enough to steal the oil and resources.

  36. I don't think China or Russia if the situation arises intend to use Naval Surface Vessels as there prime way of attacking the US Navy. They will first up strike using Aircraft carrying there Long Range Anti Ship Missiles launched from outside the Defensive umbrella of any Carrier Fleet. There Navies overall will be kept back for final Defense.
    The exact same way 70+ years ago most major Naval Battles were fought.
    Using Air Craft.

  37. Keep dreaming remember remember U-2 nothing could even detect it except a Russian rocket NICE WAKE UP CALL USA
    Remember the stealth F-117A knocked out of the sky by a bunch of Serbian pheasants with WW2 anti aircraft cannons
    Take everything with a grain of salt

  38. Relax already.Russia already captured USA.Thanks to dear comrade Donald Trump.Who will be president in 2020.And China also Russian friend..Everyting will be O.K.

  39. With a simple modiication I am sure that LRSM and SM 6 can have up to mach 5 – 6 or even mach 10 at which the enemy defense have to rest their case

  40. You mentioned that they would be effective in a swarm attack. Then mentioned that the Navy is ordering 23 of this missles. It doesnt seem like our Navy will be able to produce much of a swarm attack.

  41. Waiting for the news when the Chinese carrier get caught on camera staling in the middle of the sea and need a tug boat to bring it back to shore, or multiple fires inside due to incompetence.

  42. Hahahahah what B.S against hypersonic zircon and kinzal… No current or future strike group will ever have superiority against that type of firepower

  43. Sinc Pac Command will tether data/target links to Spip-Send radar installations on the Grovley Class T-788 interface transitions. Go ahead China, invade Taiwan. When the shit impacts, this Fan don't quit.

  44. Subsonic missiles are a questionable treat to any ship equipped with a much as conventional gun-based CIWS. Better than nothing, I suppose.

  45. If you ever had field experience with artillery you would know that even a 10 mm error when calculating coordinates will result in over 10 m cep at over 50 miles range with dumb shells. With supersonic missiles I highly doubt that these will be effective against low profile and moving targets, either the target will be relatively large and stationnary or much much closer than the max range of these missiles. Thats why the us still prefer subsonic cruise missiles, much more accurate in concordance with the us military doctrine. So no the hypersonic missiles are just a gimmick and not a threat for any professional navy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *